The nation can't afford to wait for the economy to recover before tackling out-of-control medical costs, President Barack Obama is telling some of the most powerful players in the health care reform debate.
"If we want to create jobs and rebuild our economy, then we must address the crushing cost of health care this year, in this administration," Obama says in remarks prepared for delivery to a White House forum on the issue Thursday. Excerpts were released by the White House.
"Making investments in reform now, investments that will dramatically lower costs, won't add to our budget deficits in the long term — rather, it is one of the best ways to reduce them," Obama said.
Okey dokey. How will we pay for it? WHO is going to be working on this critical issue? A whole bunch of folks, it seems:
Obama has invited to the forum more than 120 people who hold a wide range of views on how to fix the world's costliest health care system, one that still leaves an estimated 48 million people uninsured. Doctors, patients, business owners, insurers and drug industry representatives were to gather in hopes of building support for big changes. Republicans are invited, and they're expected to speak up.
"The president wants to engage with Congress in a transparent and bipartisan fashion," said Melody Barnes, who heads White House domestic policy.
Among the invitees are some who helped kill the Clinton administration's health care overhaul in the 1990s. Everyone is supposed to be on his best behavior, but will that last?
"This is a different day, " said Chip Kahn, a hospital lobbyist who opposed President Bill Clinton's plan and was to attend Thursday's gathering. "I think among most of the stakeholders, everyone wants to see this work. There is a tremendous feeling that it's time."
Now president of the Federation of American Hospitals, Kahn worked for the insurance industry in the Clinton years.
The difference this time, Obama argues, is that health care costs have become unsustainable, particularly in a sinking economy. The U.S. spends $2.4 trillion a year on health care, yet an estimated 48 million Americans lack coverage. Obama's goal is health coverage for everyone.
A different day why, exactly, Mr. Kahn? I mean, the plan back then was pretty darn good, and MAYBE if people like you hadn't worked to kill it, health care would not be the horrendous mess it is right now. Just a thought. Oh - and did anyone else notice that Kahn is a lobbyist?? Just asking...
Anyway, you know that hard-working (snark), hoops-shooting Obama - he is Johnny On The Spot with this issue:
Barnes said Obama is determined to pass health care legislation this year, and while he wants it to be bipartisan, he will not be deterred by obstruction from interest groups or ideological partisans.
"The president will make clear this has to be a bipartisan effort," Barnes said. "As for people who are there to set up hurdles, from his perspective that isn't tolerable. It's crucial to families, businesses and our nation's budget that we address the issue of exploding costs."
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky released a letter to Obama, saying his party is ready to work with the administration on health care, but warning that reforms should not lead to a government-run system, and must balance coverage expansions with curbs on costs.
Barnes said that Obama "walks into this conversation being pragmatic, being open. He knows that the American people are hurting" and are seeing their premiums rise.
But Barnes, interviewed Thursday on NBC's"Today" show, also said that "we have to be transparent about it. ... We will also hear the voices of the American people ... to make sure that health care reform gets before the president for his signature before the end of the year."
In support of Obama's efforts, liberal activists have mobilized to keep the pressure on Congress to pass legislation this year.
"It would be a mistake to dismiss this as a gabfest," Drew Altman, president of the Kaiser Family Foundation, said about Obama's meeting. "It's an effort to keep the momentum going. The details are not going to be worked in two or three hours at a White House summit."
There were concerns Wednesday about some of those details.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., who will play a leading role in writing health care legislation, raised questions about the proposed $634 billion "down payment" for expanded coverage that Obama included in the 2010 budget he released last week.
Bipartisan?? Are people still buying that hooey? And, Obama walks into this forum being "pragmatic"? Well, can someone please tell me why, then, this person is missing?
Yes, Hillary Clinton, the one who had the BEST health care policy according to Paul Krugman, and even Obama's TV Star doctor, Dr. Gupta, both favored Clinton's plan, and SHE IS NOT IN THE ROOM??? Remember when we were all saying that maybe since she was the Secretary of State, she might indeed have some input in this area? Uh, yeah, NO. Obama brings in people who derailed her policy and hard work back in the '90's, but he can't bring HER into the room?
Such a big surprise that Clinton isn't there for this important issue - hahahaha. It's too damn bad, though - especially since HER Plan covered EVERYONE and cost less per person than Obama's. He talks the talk, but walking the walk does not seem to be his forte. Once again, just like with the Stimulus Package, the Omnibus Bil, and the proposed Budget, the ones who will be paying for that is US. But even more, no way will his fragile ego ever acknowledge that Clinton's plan was actually better than his, or that maybe, just maybe, because she has worked on this so much, that she migt actually be a good person to have around that table. I sure would have felt better about whatever they concoct there if she was. But, no.
It'll be mighty interesting to see what these hospital lobbyists Obama invited to the Health Care Forum come up with on OUR behalf...