Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Whiners For Weiner, And Anti-Paliin Whining, Too

The whining would be by some men in the "journalism" profession who think what is going on with Rep. Anthony Weiner in the press is really unfair. "Leave Anthony alone!" seems to be their cry.

Good grief.

Yes, that is the problem - that Weiner's "privacy" has been violated, not that he has disgraced his office, his wife, and himself, with very little contrition for what he actually DID. No, his tears were over being CAUGHT, not that he is a freakin' pervert, engaging in sexting with women around the country, and apparently, made phone calls to some of these women from his House office. There is no doubt that not only did he act unprofessionally, but unethically, compounded by his vast number of lies upon lies.

But as Jennifer Rubin pointed out in her Washington Post piece, "Anthony Weiner, Wronged Man? Not Quite," some are taking the Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz approach, claiming this is a "private matter." They are wrong. Rubin specifically mentions Ezra Klein and Richard Cohen:
I’ve been a bit amazed at the post-bizzaro press conference insistence by some on the left that Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) is a wronged man. Ezra Klein via Twitter professes to be puzzled how this can be a big deal. Richard Cohen writes:
We are doing a terrible thing here — we hypocrites of the press, especially of the blogosphere. Every man lives a bit in a fantasy world, maybe women, too, but I know nothing of them. Every man is a boy, either in mind or in deed. Much of this is harmless. There are no bodies. There is no crime. This is the case with Weiner. No damsel was in distress, and no one was rescued.

This is the place for me to condemn Weiner. Consider it done. He’s a liar and a creep, although how one can be the latter without being the former is beyond me. (Still, lying is impermissible.) But I would also like to condemn those who made it their business to destroy him, who deputized themselves to invade someone’s private life, his fantasy life, and hold him up to ridicule.

Let me point out that Weiner went beyond fantasy. Or have we forgotten that these are real women with whom he was communicating? Women who, gosh, he thinks, are not underage. Women who he supposed would not blackmail him. Women whom he apparently told his wife about before their marriage but could not bring himself to give up. The press isn’t invading his mind or his bedroom; it’s looking at his Tweets and talking to the women on whose Timeline he was willing to risk his marriage, his career and his self-respect. [snip]

So let me make sure I understand Mr. Cohen's point - he thinks the press is doing the wrong thing by REPORTING THE NEWS??? I am just shaking my head in disbelief at these men. Oh, no, check that - I am shaking my head in DISGUST at these men, and their willingness to use their professions as "journalists" to try and protect this pervert.

Jennifer Rubin's response was very good, I thought:
[snip] Let me point out that Weiner went beyond fantasy. Or have we forgotten that these are real women with whom he was communicating? Women who, gosh, he thinks, are not underage. Women who he supposed would not blackmail him. Women whom he apparently told his wife about before their marriage but could not bring himself to give up. The press isn’t invading his mind or his bedroom; it’s looking at his Tweets and talking to the women on whose Timeline he was willing to risk his marriage, his career and his self-respect. (As for the comment, “Another Christian has been thrown to the lions. The ‘Christian in this case is a Jew,” I am dumbfounded and dismayed that Weiner’s religion should enter into the discussion.)

As for the “I just don’t get it” response of some young liberal men out there, I can only imagine that ideology so dominates their lives that they fail to see the harm in a public figure’s not-at-all-private conduct. Or perhaps they too see the Tweets as a harmless pastime. Maybe, for all the “sexual harassment” training we’ve gotten, we’ve forgotten some essential training in ethics. [snip] (Click here to read the rest.)

I don't get it, either, Ms. Rubin, except to say that this mindset is incredibly disturbing. (Ms. Rubin goes on to note that the Wall Street Journal has a very good editorial on Rep. Weiner's behavior and judgment, and I encourage you to either finish reading her piece, or read the WSJ piece here.)

The next piece of news also deals with a Democratic Representative, Earl Blumenauer. Seems Rep. Blumenauer is upset at the effort put forth by the Parks Department for doing anything that might amount to educating Gov. Palin about American history. Yes, he is upset that money is being spent to give the governor an education at our historic sites and monuments, presumably because it is making her smarter than many in the press (I refer you to the ridiculous recent brouhaha over Paul Revere) in which journalists by and large failed to factcheck before jumping on their condescending "gotcha" bandwagon).

Yes, this representative, Earl Blumenenaur, has some "serious concerns" over the money spent thus far on Palin and her bus tour:
[snip] “Many of the press accounts of stops included in this tour, which provided personal and political benefits to former Gov. Palin, suggest that National Park Service resources were made available to an extent beyond that which an average American family would receive,” Blumenauer wrote.

He cited media reports of Palin and her family receiving a private guided tour of Mount Vernon, early admission to the National Archives and a 10-person escort involving park rangers and New York City police officers at the Statue of Liberty.

“For cases in which the Park Service did not have additional personnel on duty as a result of the tour, was manpower diverted from regularly-scheduled services to accommodate the Palin family’s visits and is this a routine practice for visiting celebrities?” Blumenauer added.

National Park Service spokesman Jeffrey Olson said his understanding is that Palin received customary treatment for a visiting celebrity and that the costs of her visits were nominal at best.

“We see celebrities on a regular basis, it’s something that we’re used to,” Olson said. “We give them a tour but we also try to not make it a bug hoo-ha for all the other visitors. So it’s kind of standard fare if there’s a celebrity or two that show up we do a special program for them.”

That usually involves rangers and interpreters that are on the job regardless. "That's why it's not an extra cost for us," Olson said. "We just try to make sure everybody has a good experience at a national park." [snip] (Click here to read the rest.)

Maybe that's what is getting Rep. Blumenaur's goat - that Palin is seen as, and treated like, a celebrity. Oh, but the best part? Palin was not the one who requested the Park Police provide an escort while she was at the Statue of Liberty. Rather, it was one of the officers in charge who did that. Oops - so much for this little "gotcha" attempt by Rep. Blumenaur.

One of the commenters at this article was kind enough to post a video of another "celebrity" getting a private tour at the Statue of Liberty. I wonder if Rep. Blumenaur was so quick to investigate the money spent on THIS tour:

I am going to guess, no, Rep. Blumenaur did NOT demand an accounting from the Parks Service for Rep. Weiner being able to go where people had not been able to go since 9/11. But, hey - that's different, right? Yeah, sure, right.

And in an incredible twist of irony, Rep. Weiner called President Clinton to apologize to him for this whole sexting scandal. President Clinton officiated at Weiner and Huma Abedin's wedding.

Gee, I wonder what the conversations are like between Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin?

Blech. This whole thing is making me ill - support for this immoral, unethical piece of work (Weiner), and attempts to take down someone as a result of PDS. The hypocrisy is staggering, and I am just sick of it.

How about you? Feel free to talk about the issues above, or anything else on your mind today. Copyright © 2011 by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy


Mary Ellen said...

The, LAME stream media--as Palin calls them, are still trying to push the meme that she got her history wrong. I guess they figure they can do that because most of their faithful listeners are total idiots who think the only source of info comes from msnbc.

regarding the scum bag weiner...I saw ed shultz calling for his resignation and that didn't go over well with bill press et. al. Oh my how they protect their fellow perverts! when ed shultz becomes the voice of reason on msnbc we all know that the apocalypse is surely near.

Mary Ellen said...

Some Dems may not want to face reality, but this sign says it all....this constituent is not pleased with Weiner's decision to stay on.

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

Hey, ME -

Oh, wow - Alec Baldwin for Weiner's spot? That would be something - because HE is so squeaky clean. Ahahahaha. Ahem.

Well, at least Tim Kaine, former DNC Chair, is calling for Weiner's resignation. Honestly, when Weiner called that presser, he should have announced it right then and there.

HOLY TOLEDO - someone on MSNBC actually called for Weiner to resign?? I better go mark this on my calendar - surely, as you say, the end is near!! :-)

He basically gave away that he can be manipulated pretty easily, so who would trust him with any kind of national security interests??

I saw that Kirsten Powers used to date him, and she said women would come up and just through their cards at him. WHY???? He is an arrogant SOB, and not very attractive (inside or out). WTH is wrong with these women??

Sigh. I have to say, it makes me mad at women who throw themselves at a married man. And, I have to wonder abt his wife - she knew he was sexting total strangers before they got married. That says a LOT abt him as a person. Perhaps she could have recommended, no, DEMANDED, he get THERAPY to deal with his issues...

Mary Ellen said...

Rev.Amy- I have no idea what any woman would see in him. He reminds me a little of Barney Fife on the Andy Griffith Show.

When I saw the woman on Hannity's show last night talking about Weiner's communication with her, I was a little pissed off when she said she knew he was married and yet continued to allow him to make sexual advances toward her. The first thing I would do if I knew the guy was married would be to tell him to shove off. So, she sat on the show calling him weird and crazy but she didn't seem to knock herself out to tell him where to go.

I listened to that tape of Alec Baldwin screaming and insulting his 11 year old daughter on that infamous phone message and it just made me sick. I couldn't help but think of my grandkids...they have to listen to that same stuff from the idiot doc. It's abusive and sick, especially when he threatened that he was flying in later in the week and she was "really going to get it." Nice threat....great guy, eh?

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

ME, I jsut do not know what is wrong with these women going after someone they know is married. What, did they think he would dump his wife who works for the Sec. of State for them? C'mon already. That is just ridiculous.

But yes, the immorality is appalling.

That would be the tape - the one of Baldwin screaming at his kid. I am sure that did seem way too familiar. Holy cow...