Thursday, June 9, 2011

Chris Matthews' Trip To Crazy Town

Okay, you know it is bad when other journalists, and frequent guests, are talking about how nutso Chris Matthews has become. What seemed to prompt this outspokenness on their part was the attempt by Matthews to pin the Weiner scandal on Weiner's WIFE, as if it was her fault her husband is an unethical, perverted, sleazeball. Wow, talk about blaming the victim there, Matthews.

No, Anthony Weiner has no one but himself to blame for the mess he is in. His long time friend (and for a brief period, girlfriend), Kirsten Powers, came out with a scathing post about Weiner on Wednesday, June 7th. She has been friends with him for years, and unknowingly carried his water on "Hannity" in defense of Weiner. She is not carrying it any more, as this post highlights:
[snip] Narcissism doesn’t begin to describe this kind of behavior. It seems there was nobody he didn’t lie to. The New York Times reported this morning that he told donors a week ago that the scandal was the result of a “vast right-wing conspiracy” and that “everything [would] be fine.” We also learned after his press conference that he coached a former porn star with whom he had communicated online on how to lie to the media.

But even if I could see past the lying and extreme narcissism that is noteworthy even by Washington standards, there is the issue of his attitude toward women. What has emerged is a picture of a predator trolling the Internet for women—some half his age—with which to engage in cybersex. We know only about the women who were responsive to his overtures. The odds are very high that he struck out with many, and other women were victim to his unsolicited sex talk. Women should be able to “friend” a married—or unmarried—congressman on Facebook or follow him on Twitter without fear of being the recipient of lewd talk or behavior. Just because a woman “likes” your video on Facebook doesn’t mean you can send her a picture of your penis. This is textbook sexual harassment. It may not be illegal, but it’s definitely unethical. He is in a position of influence, and many women—especially a 21-year-old—would be afraid to report a congressman doing that to them because he holds so much power. Also, he claims none of the women he contacted were underage, but how could he possibly know that?

By far the most disturbing information that we have been privy to—there is, no doubt, more out there that we don’t know—is the transcript of a nine-month "sexting" relationship Weiner had with a Las Vegas blackjack dealer. Radar Online posted the transcript, and it is rife with misogyny and distorted views about women...


A whisper campaign has started in New York that Weiner’s wife was partly to blame for what happened. “You know, she does travel a lot” is what one New York political operative told me they have heard from multiple reporters. So now we have the “blame the woman” campaign even though what Weiner did had zero to do with sexual satisfaction and everything to do with his own mental issues and attitude toward women. And, by the way, plenty of men have wives who travel and they don’t start preying on women on the Internet and sending pictures of their private parts. [snip] (Click here to read the rest, and believe me, it is well worth your time.)

Again, Powers' post is well worth your time - there are some things in there to support her charge of misogyny, and she is right on the money.

Unlike Chris Matthews, whose sexist, boorish behavior have been on display for a number of years. You may recall that even Media Matters took him to task for his sexism toward Hillary Clinton, though his expression of such seems to have only scratched the surface:
[snip] One young conservative female guest who appeared several times on Matthews’ show told TheDC that bizarre comments toward women were part of his off air banter as well.

“During one appearance, during the commercial break, Matthews informed me he loves it when women wear baby doll dresses,” she said. “It’s his favorite thing to see women wear.”


Liberal watchdog groups such as Media Matters and the Daily Kos have hit Matthews hard for his poorly chosen, even misogynistic words toward liberal women.

Media Matters noted Matthews’ poor math in trying to figure out how many women governors there were in 2008.

“Where are the big-state women governors? Where are they? Name one. They don’t exist,” Matthews said of the potential for a future female presidential candidate.

Media Matters subsequently pointed out that in 2008 there were in fact many female governors with populations comparable to the big name former governor presidential candidates, such as Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire, Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, Connecticut Gov. M. Jodi Rell, and Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius.[snip]

Holy crappydoo. Seriously?? "Babydoll" clothes? Unaware that there are a number of women governors??

Yeah, this guy is a lunatic:
[snip] His emotional rants have become commonplace on “Hardball,” and made his show must-watch TV for the likes of Mediate, NewsBusters, Real Clear Politics and even The Daily Caller — all waiting with bated breath for Matthews to inevitably say something “insane.”

When asked by TheDC why he watches so religiously, Ian Schwartz, Real Clear Politics video editor, did not mince words.

“‘Hardball’ is a reminder that I am sane,” said Schwartz. “Chris Matthews is more of a gaffe machine than Joe Biden and the ignorance of his sexism and bigotry makes the show entertaining to watch.”

“He’s a freak show” said another media reporter. [snip]

You got that right, for so, so many reasons.

But you know who one of his favorite targets is:
[snip] Sarah Palin is another of Matthews’ punching bags. He has called the former Alaska governor and former vice presidential nominee “profoundly stupid,” “a dolt,” and an “empty head.”

“He’s a known sexist pig. It’s not misogyny based on political party,” Amy Siskind, president of the women’s advocacy group The New Agenda, wrote at TheDC. “No, Matthews has a familiar pattern: he purposefully strikes out at any woman who is rising in power.” [snip] (Click here to read the rest. I have just scratched the surface of this outstanding article.)

Matthews thinks Palin is "profoundly stupid" and a "dolt"? Wow. This is just yet another uninformed opinion put forth by this brain trust.

I will allow Gov. Palin herself to dispel the biased, sexist attack by Chris Matthews in this synopsis of her recent bus tour:

Just WHO is "profoundly stupid," Mr. Matthews? I'll give you a hint. It ain't Gov. Palin. Copyright © 2011 by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy


Stray Yellar Dawg? said...

Chris Matthews needs to go the way of the ignorant sexist dolts before him: Keith Olbermann and Glenn Beck.

All three of them deserve to be booted out of our prime time "news" and pushed into the margins of crazyland.

It was an interesting experiment, boys. But America's not buyin'.

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

Hey, SYD -

I agree. The only reason I can fathom NBC keeps him is they like the ratings from those who tune in to see what assholic thing he is going to say next. He's a piece of work.

I still cannot believe I liked Keith Olbermann. He just let fly with his misogyny once Obama was on the scene. It's like it gave him permission, for some reason, to unleash all of the vitriol against women he had had to hold in check.

I haven't watched Beck enough to experience his sexism, but at least he WILL be gone by the end of this month, so there's that.

I just read a piece by Alec Baldwin at HuffPo in support of Weiner. The convoluted "logic" he used to defend him is appalling.

And he wants to run for May of NY? Yikes.

Democratic women really need to stand up to these misogynists, and now...

Mary Ellen said...

I can't think of one person on MSNBC who can be considered a reliable journalist, not one.

I don't think I'll ever understand the women in this country who have so much hatred for Sarah Palin. Just today I saw a comment from one who, while bashing Sarah Palin couldn't help but throw in a comment about Trig. They're a very sick bunch.

Did you see that the NYT and WaPo are calling for help to go through the 25,000 e-mails that Sarah put out during her time as Governor of Alaska in order to "find something damaging"? media bias there!

Too bad they didn't work that hard to research Obama when he ran for President. But hey...he's a guy, better yet..he's a BLACK guy.

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

Hey, ME -

When Rachel Maddow asked Weiner if he minded answering a question before she even ASKED the question, she reinforced how biased they are. Their "opponents" they try to play "GOTCHA!" They sure don't ask permission to ask them something. Sheesh.

NO KIDDING abt Obama and his not getting anywhere NEAR the scrutiny Palin gets. She hasn't even said she is RUNNING - why are they so hellbent to find something negative against her?

Hell, with Obama, it wasn't even that hard to find - they just ignored it all. Hang out with a domestic terrorist who has bombed the Capitol Bldg? Eh, no biggie. Get everyone thrown off the ballot to run opposed (or practically, when he ran against Alan Keyes)? Hey, just smart politics, especially for someone who isn't a politician, wink, wink, nudge, nudge...And you know I could go on.

So, so, so sexist. I am sick of it.