David Brock, the conservative turned liberal advocate, has recently garnered a considerable amount of press coverage for his attacks on Fox News for, among many other things, allegedly taking over leadership of the Republican Party. What the news coverage has ignored is his use of tax-free funds for his organization, Media Matters for America (MMA), for these attacks — a form of government support for activities that clearly do not merit tax-exempt status and that as a result infringe on Fox News’ First Amendment rights.
MMA was originally established as an Internal Revenue Service Section 501(c)(3) organization, that is, an organization that can receive tax-deductible contributions to engage in educational activities. The more precise purpose was to counter alleged media bias and so to “identify occurrences of excessive bias in the American media, educate the public as to their existence, and to work with members of the media to reduce them.”
What MMA actually is doing, however, moves far afield from identifying possible bias to mounting a campaign to undermine a major media outlet and to promote the Democratic Party and progressive causes associated with it. Mr. Brock himself has described this new strategy as “a war on Fox,” an effort “to disrupt [Rupert Murdoch‘s] commercial interests” and look for ways to turn regulators against News Corp.’s media outlets. [snip] (Click here to read the rest.)
It does not matter if you like Fox, or hate it, but for taxpayer dollars to go to support an alleged non-profit that has a clear political agenda is unacceptable, regardless of whose political agenda it is. There are laws in this country against that sort of thing, after all. And there is that pesky matter of the US Constitution and the First Amendment. Taxpayers should NOT be funding this organization. If George Soros wants to fund it, that's his decision, but Media Matters sure should not receive our money as a "non-profit." That is just ridiculous.
And speaking of money, Obama was in New York last night at a few fundraisers, trying to fill his coffers. I just have to ask - who is it that can afford a $35,800 a plate dinner?? That is not a typo - there are five numbers there on purpose. Just wondering.
While Obama was at it, he did a little pandering to the LGBT community, claiming he thinks we should have the same rights in this country as everyone else. I agree with that, but what CNN was not so great about reporting was that Obama also said he thought it should be a state matter. Huh - that's the same thing Michelle Bachmann said in the recent debate (to give you a comparison).
Meanwhile, DADT is STILL the law of the land over 6 months later after the big hoopla in December. Yep, the government has not finished what it needs to do to change that. Big surprise, huh? Yeah, I didn't think so...
Add to that Obama misspeaking about a Medal of Honor recipient while pandering at Fort Drum:
[snip] "Throughout my service, first as a senator and then as a presidential candidate and then as a President, I’ve always run into you guys. And for some reason it’s always in some rough spots.
First time I saw 10th Mountain Division, you guys were in southern Iraq. When I went back to visit Afghanistan, you guys were the first ones there. I had the great honor of seeing some of you because a comrade of yours, Jared Monti, was the first person who I was able to award the Medal of Honor to who actually came back and wasn’t receiving it posthumously."[snip]
Except it was. Oops...
There is more going on, and feel free to discuss whatever you wish! Copyright © 2011 by Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy
2 comments:
Add to that Obama misspeaking about a Medal of Honor recipient while pandering at Fort Drum:
Well, that's what happens when you have a bunch of drunken frat boys writing your speeches for you. Not to mention, I don't think Obama would remember anything about awarding medals because the whole time he's doing it, he's only thinking of his next round of golf.
As usual, Obama just tried to throw a bone to the LGBT community with his little speech about gay marriage. Basically, he did the same thing he did in Illinois...sort of a "present" vote. He straddles both sides of the political fence, more concerned about campaigning and votes and he could care less about the issues. How any one from the LGBT community could support this lying sack of shit is beyond me.
(PS: Knee feeling better I hope???)
ME, I don't know how people in the community are still supporting him, either. But when I was in my home town, some friends there said many of their friends in the community were NOT going to support him this time around. Gee - wish they had listened to us the FIRST time...
As for the drunken speechwriters, no kidding. And this is what happens when someone is just READING a text as it flashes before him instead of knowing anything abt it. Typical.
Thanks for asking - unfortunately, I seem to be a "riddle." More waiting - my ortho is not keen on opening me back up, and wants it to be a last resort, which I appreciate. But in the meantime, it hurts like hell...
Post a Comment