Friday, December 18, 2009

"Are Hillary Clinton Supporters Murmuring, I Told You So?"

Hell no, we haven't been "murmuring." We've been yelling it from the damn rooftops for months and months now! Oh, um, yeah, let me take a step back. So there's this article by Marc Rubin entitled, you guessed it, "Are Hillary Supporters Murmuring I Told You So?".

Welcome to the party, Marc:
With a new NBC/Wall Street journal poll showing Obama hitting his lowest rating in that poll, and the poll showing that people are getting fed up with Obama, the Democrats and how both have handled health care, ( how they handled it, not rejecting things like the public option) those who supported Hillary Clinton for president in the Democratic primaries are starting to say "I told you so".

Obama's had the biggest approval ratings drop of any first year president in history. He has disappointed most of his supporters on the left. And he has accomplished little to nothing in his first year that has showed any concrete results in spite of him giving himself a B+.

What he has done is make more speeches and had more prime time press conferences in his first year than any president has had in their first term.

And play golf - Rubin forgot to add that Obama has played more golf in his short time in office than Bush did in three years. So glad he's working so hard, aren't you? Well, it shows:
On healthcare reform most of his supportes (sic) are complaining that he sold out and was two faced in his capitulation. Which he was. But these are traits he exhibited not only during his entire 12 years of elected office, but were on glaring display during the Democratic primaries.

Now everyone is angry with him for showing a lack of principle, commitment, experience and expertise and a willingness to sacrifice a principle on a dime but that's who Obama has always been and he showed it repeatedly during the primaries, whether he was willing to sell out the voters of Florida and Michigan to help himself get elected, or reversing himself on a pledge to use public financing.

Now as Obama's approval ratings continue to hit record lows for a first term president, and he is bringing the Democratic party down with him, as people are getting fed up with his handling of a propositon (sic) -- the public option and health care reform -- that 72% supported back in June, many Hillary Clinton supporters are starting to say "we told you so".

More and more of Obama's staunchest supporters, the same people who turned a blind eye to Obama's deep character flaws, lack of experience, and brazen political dishonesty, and deceit, are now complaining that he's not what they thought he was, that this isnt change they can believe in. But it never was in the first place. It was clear to anyone who paid attention that was nothing but a slogan.

Uh, yep - it surely was. Maybe that's why his supporters were so mean and hateful to those of us in the reality-based world - because they KNEW Obama was nothing more than smoke and mirrors. By that point, they were already in too deep to admit they were wrong:
Ed Schultz, Arianna Huffington, the people at The Nation, Matt Taibbi at Rolling Stone, are just a few of Obama flag wavers now wavering in their support and scratching their heads saying "what happened"?

The answer is nothing happened. Obama is just being the same Obama he always was, the same Obama that was apparent during the Democratic primaries, the same Obama that a 18 months ago after listening to a couple of speeches, write that he was a snake oil salesman and the most underhanded, deceitful politician since Richard Nixon. But the press. who was in Obama's pocket, refused to see it.

For those who saw through the phoniness, Obama has been exactly what the majority of Democratic primary voters thought he was. Remember that Hillary Clinton actually received more votes than he did and went into the Democratic convention having won the popular vote.

During the primaries Clinton supporters mocked Obama supporters and their beliefs as people who were "drinking the Kool-Aid". Obama supporters accused Clinton supporters, and anyone who opposed Obama's candidacy of being racist. This, from the candidate who ran on the fiction that he had the ability to unite people and bring people together. He ran on the fiction that he had some great ability to unite Democrats and Republicans. Which is why every Republican is voting against the health care bill and hasnt been able to unite any disparate group on anything.

Oh, right, how could I forget? Yes, we were all racists for expecting a presidential candidate to actually have some freakin' qualifications to BE president. Yes, rather than admit they were wrrrooonnnggg, they pulled out the last "refuge of the liberal scoundrel," as Charles Krauthammer said. They made an attack so vile, there was no way to defend oneself without the accuser acting smug and arrogant claiming we were nothing but liars about our racism. Oh, good times, good times, NOT.

So, now the veil is lifting for those who were too blind to see for over two years:
In a recent article in Rolling Stone, Matt Taibbi writes, "Obama pulled a bait-and-switch on us. If it were any other politician, we wouldn't be surprised. Maybe it's our fault, for thinking he was different."

Yes it was your fault for not seeing what was right in front of everyone, and the fact that he pulled a bait and switch shouldnt leave anyone surprised. That was the snake oil Obama was selling during the primaries and a lot of people bought and are now finding out it was all just sugar water.

Why people are feeling more stung by Obama is that he did hold himself up to be a different kind of politician, someone above the petty politics and back room deals. And people bought it. What also makes it particularly insidious is when a snake oil salesman goes into a community that is hurting from disease and tells everyone he has the cure and its right in this here bottle when all along he knows its nothing but sugar water. That's called a con. And now a lot of people who should have known better are realizing it.

It was clear during the primaries when Obama constantly reneged on promises and pledges and resorted to serial lying both when it came to Jeremiah Wright, and the incident in Ohio when a document was leaked that caught Obama red handed, lying to the people of Ohio about his position on NAFTA. He told the people in Ohio who were hurting economically precisely because of things in NAFTA that if they elected him he;d (sic) get rid of NAFTA. At the same time he caught telling the Candians (sic)to ignore what he said in Ohio, that he had no intention of getting rid of NAFTA that it was just for politics. If a politician is willing to get that low, nothing should surprise anyone. But at the time it was exposed, the same people who are complaining now about Obama betraying them didn't care and turned a blind eye. If Clinton had been caught doing the same thing the press would have demanded she drop out and would have called her unworthy of being president, that she couldnt (sic) be trusted.

And so it was, the blind leading the blind. Did people REALLY believe that someone who chose Chicago for its style of politics, and who was completely enmeshed with those Chicago politicians, was truly ABOVE those politics? Really? Deep down inside?? If so, that's just a bit delusional, especially considering what so many of us knew:
The fact that Obama was clearly the least qualified candidate for the Democratic nomination, didnt (sic) seem to matter to his supporters either. And while he claimed he was the person who knew how to bring people together the Democratic presidential primaries were the most divisive in the history of the party. He campaigned saying "voices must be heard" but he did everything in is power to keep the voices of voters in Florida and Michigan from being heard because he was landslided there by Clinton. Instead of fighting for the right to have their votes count on principle, he was quite content to have them silenced in favor of his own ambitions. So why are people surprised now, feeling that he sold them out on healthcare reform?

The other big issue that seemed to matter to Obama's supporters was that he was black. So they took everything Martin Luther King stood for and threw out the window, which was that a person should be judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin and decided the color of his skin mattered more.

But while this will come as a shock to them, Obama is not the first black president. He is the first mixed race president, half black and half white. He is no more the country's first black president than Derek Jeter was the Yankees first black shortstop. In all of Jeter's hall of fame career no one ever referred to him that way. But his genetic make up is the same as Obama's. The difference is the random shuffling of genetic material which resulted in Jeter having more Caucasian features and a caramel complexion while Obama's features and complexion were more black. Maybe now that they feel betrayed by Obama,those who supported him because they wanted a black president will admit Martin Luther King was right the first time.

Oh, if only. People wanted to see what they wanted to see, and decided, for their own, dare I say it, racist reasons, that Obama's candidacy was MORE historic than the first WOMAN. We've had plenty of men, some better than others, but never, ever a woman of ANY ethnicity, yet only Obama's was historic. What a crock of shit. (And I appreciate being able to work my Derek Jeter into this conversation!)

So were all of Obama's promises:
During the primaries, Obama's selling out his promises were rampant. He promised to use public financing if he was the nominee then reneged as soon as became the nominee. He promised to filibuster and vote against the FISA bill if it gave telecoms retroactive immunity then reneged, didnt filibuster and voted for it. And lied, until he couldn't lie any longer about his relationship with Jeremiah Wright and on sending on his economic advisors to the Canadian embassy to tell them to ignore everything he was saying publicly about NAFTA.

This is the person that liberals and Democrats who supported him are now surprised has sold them out when it was apparent that Obama was probably the most underhanded politician since Richard Nixon. The difference between the two is that Nixon used deceit to get even. Obama used it to get ahead. It all goes to character and how that influences decisions. As well as having a vision and sticking up for a principle, something he has thrown overboard on healthcare.

So perhaps Hillary Clinton supporters can be excused if they are now saying " We told you so". Because they did.

Still are, and will be until this sham of a president is out of office, this man who cares more about appearing in COMMERCIALS than actually doing the work of the most important politician in the world. This man who seems constitutionally incapable of speaking the truth, or even taking a good long look at himself in the mirror. This man who will put his wife down on national tv in YET another appearance, because NO ONE is capable of doing ANYTHING better than he is. At least in his mind, and he doesn't give a damn who he throws under the bus to make that point clear, including the mother of his two children.

Yep - we've been saying it for over two years. Obama was never qualified to be president, all the words he proclaimed notwithstanding. So yeah, those of us who supported the person who very likely would have been the greatest president in our lifetime have said this until we are hoarse: WE. TOLD. YOU. SO.


Mary Ellen said...

WQW! We're on the same page, I just did an "I told you so" post today. Mine isn't as informative as yours...and probably a bit mean-spirited, but I had fun getting all the pics together.

I was checking out all the Obot blogs that kicked me off and called me a racist during the Primary and they are whining and crying like the biggest babies I've ever seen. But the one comment I read that cracked me up..."maybe we should have voted for Hillary". BINGO!!!

Obama is going to have to come up with some new, stronger kool-aid. Maybe that's the deal he struck with Big Pharma...a new prescription strength kool-aid if Obama and the Dems give them everything they want.

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

LOL abt the deal with Big Pharma - you are too damn funny, Mary Ellen! Ohmygosh, you crack me up!

Hey, sister - we are totally on the same page anyway, but it is COOL that you did one on the same topic! I'll be getting my butt right over there. (I love your blog, you know, so I don't need any convincing!)

And yeah, NO DUH abt how they should have voted for Hillary, the Yahoos! Good grief - to think their heads could so easily be turned, especially after BUSH - that's what I don't understand at ALL!!

Maybe they thought the Reps had their one guy who no one could believe made it to the presidency on his record, so why shouldn't the Dems have one, too, who had even LESS of a record?? Whatever the glaring lapse of logic it was for them, here we are, stuck with this guy for another three years.


I bet they'll be happy to take you back, now. I tell you, though, Krauthammer has it right when he talks abt using the charge of racism - there is no defense for it, and it merely indicates the weakness of their position to have to hurl it at others.

So, did you see SFIndie's comment on yesterday's blog? I'll bottom line it for you - y'all need to go on vacation and come visit! :-)

Mary Ellen said...

Thanks for pointing out SF's comment on the last post, I might have missed it otherwise.

It would be fun to meet up with SF out at your place. Maybe next year, I don't think it would be a bad drive out there.

What really killed me was when I heard Dean say that he wouldn't "vigorously" campaign for Obama in 2012...but he'd still vote for him. What an ass. He's the reason we're in this mess with his "vigorous" cheating and thug-like tactics to get him elected over Hillary in the first place. He's the biggest schmuck on the face of the to Michael Moore. (Did you hear he wants everyone to "boycott" Connecticut. How in the hell do you "boycott" a state? Is everyone supposed to stick out their tongues and refuse to buy maple syrup from them? What a moron.

Again...he's the one who said there MUST be a public option on this health care bill and then complained and whined about it on MSNBC...but he's pissed at the GOP and Lieberman for trying to stop this bill from going through. Talk about fractured thinking! He and the rest of those dodo's would be happy if this bill passed even if it will hurt all long as they can claim victory.

Freakin' kool-aid just rotted what little brains they already had.

Rabble Rouser Reverend Amy said...

That would be SO much fun to hang out with you two! :-)

Dean, please. I couldn't believe it when I saw he was complaining abt this horrible health care bill. He SHOVED this man down our throats, and he's been whining ever since. He'd vote for him again?? (Ed Schultz said the same thing, that he would vote for him again even though he is disappointed in him. Schultz seemed almost conservative to me before he got his gig on MSNBC - still don't know how THAT happened.)

What is WRONG with these people? Again, I think they are incapable of admitting they made a HORRIBLE choice, so they are going to keep saying this no matter what Obama does. Pathetic, really.

Micheal Moore has gone off the deep end. I still can't believe that MILLIONAIRE making a movie on Capitalism, the very practice that made him RICH!!! There's more of that fractured thinking for you. Boycott CT - oh, DAMN that Lieberman for having a mind of his own (I have seen people rag on Lieberman, for whom I have no love lost, I must admit, for being a pawn of the ins. companies. Isn't that EXACTLY what Dean's problem is with this bill???).

These people just wear me out...